At Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:56:51 +0200, David Bremner wrote:
> Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> writes:
>
> >
> > Meanwhile, I haven't answered your original question. Can you remind me
> > of the specific steps that I'd need to follow to try the script that
> > you sent before?
>
> With your indulgence, I'll just answer this part now. I have re-included
> the Makefile as an attachment, since make is fussy about whitespace.
>
> Save the attached file to e.g. /tmp/test.mk
>
> In a recent checkout of the release branch,
>
> % make -f /tmp/test.mk build-indep-stamp
>
> the resulting build of racket will be in test-dest, in the top level
> directory of racket. For me, test-dest/usr/bin only has racket and raco
> in it.
The problem is that `make install` works with a configuration whose
paths are based on DESTDIR, but as its final act it rewrites
"config.rktd" and other files to strip away DESTDIR. That rewrite tells
the later use of `raco pkg install` to put binaries in the DESTDIRless
path (i.e., "/usr/bin"), and so on. It's a kind of bad luck that `raco
pkg install` runs at all, since it could depend on the DESTDIRless pass
in any number of ways, such as an embedded path in a shared library.
If you really want to go this way, I could extend the makefile to let
you supply a command that runs before the path-fixup step of `make
install`. Then, your "test.mk" would look more like this:
build-arch-stamp: ${base_build_dir}/Makefile
$(MAKE) -C ${base_build_dir}
$(MAKE) -C ${base_build_dir} DESTDIR=${destdir} install \
FINAL_PREP_CMD="cd $(CURDIR) \
&& $(MAKE) RACKET="'"'"${PRERACKET}"'"'" \
local-source-catalog \
&& ${PRERACKET} -N raco -l- \
pkg install ${raco_args} \
main-distribution racket-lib"
touch $@
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
