Some of us have discussed this in recent months. So far, our conclusion has been "not yet".
At Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:56:01 +0000, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > (Sorry if this is the wrong list) > > I just saw the LTS Haskell announcement, and it made me wonder if there is > a racket equivalent? > > I've had occasion to use packages from older versions of racket recently > and the ability to run quite old code unchanged is remarkable, despite many > significant changes to racket itself in the past few years. > > The rate of change in Racket *is* terrifyingly but because of the > remarkable backwards compatibility I'm not terribly concerned. > > Kind regards and HNY, > Stephen > > Announcing LTS Haskell 1.0 | FP Complete > https://www.fpcomplete.com/blog/2015/01/announcing-lts-haskell-1-0 > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev