On 2015-01-13 03:05:30 -0800, Alexis King wrote: > Also, Asumu, a related problem: are there any issues with changing > local-require back to require that would break anything else? Or can you > possibly implement that change in TR with no issues?
I initially thought there would be (hence my previous e-mail), but actually it seems to work. Originally TR switched to using local-require to get require/typed working in the REPL/top-level, but it seems that other changes since then (I think commit a4a2ccacc3f896) made that unnecessary. Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev