[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15837395#comment-15837395
 ] 

Velmurugan Periasamy edited comment on RANGER-1326 at 1/25/17 8:54 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

bq. 1. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6949e2f048b07478c861a675ad8e98d750e0f786b272a6afc69df78e@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Addressed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1159

bq. 2. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9552c63b71a38ed75cd252463e788408aa4a9a05abeba36168df5a12@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Addressed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1109

bq. 3. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de169a09f7527fbc3549518f0227ba40ee8524c6e60ba8105d82479b@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Suggestions made here are conflicting with suggestions made in reference thread 
2 above. For example, thread 2 suggests Font Awesome and json2.js belong in 
NOTICE whereas thread 3 suggests they should belong in LICENSE.

[~jmclean]/[~joewitt] - could you please clarify?

CC [~sneethiraj]

Regarding threads 4 and 5 (JSON license becoming category X), there is no 
immediate solution for the currently planned releases (0.6.3 and 0.7.0). 


was (Author: vperiasamy):
bq. 1. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6949e2f048b07478c861a675ad8e98d750e0f786b272a6afc69df78e@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Addressed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1159

bq. 2. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9552c63b71a38ed75cd252463e788408aa4a9a05abeba36168df5a12@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Addressed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1109

bq. 3. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de169a09f7527fbc3549518f0227ba40ee8524c6e60ba8105d82479b@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Suggestions made here are conflicting with suggestions made in reference thread 
2 above. For example, thread 2 suggests Font Awesome and json2.js belong in 
NOTICE whereas thread 3 suggests they should belong in LICENSE.

[~jmclean]/[~joewitt] - could you please clarify?

CC [~sneethiraj]

> Fix remaining licensing issues
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RANGER-1326
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1326
>             Project: Ranger
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.2
>            Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>             Fix For: 0.7.0, 0.6.3
>
>
> We need to fix the remaining licensing issues as raised by Jusin:
> For items not fixed please see [1][2][3].
> Also note that with json2.js license it seems a little unclear to me and may 
> be under the JSON license. It does have “public domain” in the code so it may 
> be OK, it still however needs to be added to LICENSE. Just be careful as the 
> JSON license no longer allowed in Apache software and it is considered 
> category X. [4] In this case you do have a few months grace to remove this 
> [5] but you need to call it out in NOTICE and it still needs to be removed by 
> end of April. [5]
> 1. 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6949e2f048b07478c861a675ad8e98d750e0f786b272a6afc69df78e@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> 2. 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9552c63b71a38ed75cd252463e788408aa4a9a05abeba36168df5a12@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> 3. 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de169a09f7527fbc3549518f0227ba40ee8524c6e60ba8105d82479b@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> 4. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-x
> 5. 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bb18f942ce7eb83c11438303c818b885810fb76385979490366720d5@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to