> On May 17, 2017, 11:12 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > Why is the iteration count now "17"?

For previous version this iteration count was 17 so to support backwards 
compatibility we have kept this count as 17, once the upgrade is successful the 
user can change the value in xml file.
For fresh install whatever the user want they can configure accordingly.


- bhavik


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59335/#review175228
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 17, 2017, 11:05 a.m., bhavik patel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59335/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 17, 2017, 11:05 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan 
> Neethiraj, Mehul Parikh, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, 
> and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1583
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1583
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> After upgrade from ranger-0.6 to ranger-0.7 all test connections are failing 
> for plugins.
> Below error is shown in xa_portal.log:
> ERROR org.apache.ranger.plugin.util.PasswordUtils (PasswordUtils.java:129) - 
> Unable to decrypt password due to error
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PasswordUtils.java 
> 3759b8d 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 
> a44aa46 
>   security-admin/src/main/resources/conf.dist/ranger-admin-default-site.xml 
> 4f5f1d3 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59335/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. After upgrade from ranger-0.6 to ranger-0.7 verified plugins 
> test-connections & resource-lookup.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> bhavik patel
> 
>

Reply via email to