[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16084003#comment-16084003
 ] 

Nigel Jones edited comment on RANGER-1487 at 7/12/17 1:47 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Having considered this approach some more, ALTAS-1869 will now discuss a 
mechanism for adding the capability to capture some metadata about ranger rules 
within atlas. This can allow business concepts & organization policies to be 
linked with specific rules that implement these policies. I will add more info 
there and create an similar jira for ranger if we feel that info is useful in 
atlas


was (Author: jonesn):
Having considered this approach some more, RANGER-1869 will now discuss a 
mechanism for adding the capability to capture some metadata about ranger rules 
within atlas. This can allow business concepts & organization policies to be 
linked with specific rules that implement these policies

> generate rules from Governance definitions in Atlas
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RANGER-1487
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1487
>             Project: Ranger
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Ranger
>            Reporter: Nigel Jones
>            Assignee: Nigel Jones
>              Labels: VirtualDataConnector
>
> As part of the Atlas virtual connector project we intend to build "rules" 
> that relate to classifications within Atlas itself. These are logical 
> definitions that will then be mapped to specific implementations such as 
> rules/policies in ranger (but could also be in other systems like Oracle, or 
> Apache Sentry -- different enforcement approaches for different data access 
> points).
> Opening this Jira to build a "sync/build/link" tool that will generate ranger 
> rules where possible.
> (Very rough description ... will update & clarify)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to