-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62398/#review186236
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Qiang Zhang


On 九月 21, 2017, 8:47 a.m., pengjianhua wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62398/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 九月 21, 2017, 8:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Alok Lal, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Colm O 
> hEigeartaigh, Gautam Borad, Madhan Neethiraj, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan 
> Neethiraj, Velmurugan Periasamy, and Qiang Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1790
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1790
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The current logic is as following:
> 1. Other checkbox will be selected when the "Select checkbox" was selected.
> 2. Other checkbox will be deselected when the "Deselect checkbox" was 
> selected.
> 3. The "Select / Deselect All" checkbox was not automatically selected when 
> all checkbox were Selected.
> 4. The "Select / Deselect All" checkbox was not automatically deselected when 
> all checkbox were deselected.
> The right logic should be as following:
> 1. Other checkbox will be selected when the "Select checkbox" was selected.
> 2. Other checkbox will be deselected when the "Deselect checkbox" was 
> selected.
> 3. The "Select / Deselect All" checkbox was automatically selected when all 
> checkbox were Selected.
> 4. The "Select / Deselect All" checkbox was automatically deselected when all 
> checkbox were deselected.
> Please refer to select-all-permissions.png and select-all-permissions-01.png.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/webapp/scripts/views/policies/PermissionList.js 
> 0803945e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62398/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> pengjianhua
> 
>

Reply via email to