[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16181977#comment-16181977
]
Madhan Neethiraj commented on RANGER-1796:
------------------------------------------
bq. the case you mentioned can be handled
[~peng.jianhua] - can you add details on how the approach you suggest address
this use case?
> Updated masking policy for hive to support for
> deny/allowException/denyExceptions
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RANGER-1796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1796
> Project: Ranger
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: plugins
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, master
> Reporter: peng.jianhua
> Assignee: peng.jianhua
> Labels: newbie, patch
> Attachments:
> 0001-RANGER-1796-Updated-masking-policy-for-hive-to-suppo.patch,
> masking2.png, usecase-01.png
>
>
> Masking policy for hive should support for
> deny/allowException/denyExceptions to meet further business needs. Such as
> masking policy for hive should support as following scene and so on:
> USER1, USER2 and USER3 belong to the user group GROUPA. Select GROUPA group
> when created masking policy. The USER1 does not use masking and USER2, USER3
> need masking.
> We rigorously tested this issue. The test result shows that the feature is ok.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
