> On April 2, 2018, 9:58 p.m., Velmurugan Periasamy wrote:
> > kms/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/crypto/key/RangerMasterKey.java
> > Line 200 (original), 322 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66357/diff/1/?file=1990118#file1990118line324>
> >
> >     Why is salt generated from password? Change to random values.
> 
> bhavik patel wrote:
>     We can not use random values because at the time of encryption & 
> decryption of key will require same value of saltGen. If we want, we can also 
> make it configurable properties like other.

Yes, that's what I meant. Make it a configurable option. Thanks.


- Velmurugan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66357/#review200319
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 29, 2018, 12:10 p.m., bhavik patel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66357/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 29, 2018, 12:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay 
> Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Mehul Parikh, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, 
> Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-2017
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2017
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Code Improvement To Follow Best Practices.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kms/config/kms-webapp/dbks-site.xml 2fc5177 
>   kms/scripts/DBMK2HSM.sh 89c8c2d 
>   kms/scripts/HSMMK2DB.sh 2637cf6 
>   kms/scripts/importJCEKSKeys.sh d72c93e 
>   kms/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/crypto/key/RangerMasterKey.java 5614c16 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66357/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. Verified Ranger Kms is working as expected.
> 2. Import/Export of key's working as expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> bhavik patel
> 
>

Reply via email to