> On April 5, 2019, 11:02 p.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote: > > agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/RangerPolicyEngineImpl.java > > Lines 171 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70397/diff/1/?file=2137615#file2137615line171> > > > > is 'other' (RangerPolicyEngineImpl) only shares with a single > > RangerPolicyEngineImpl?
Yes - Abhay ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70397/#review214433 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 5, 2019, 3:09 a.m., Abhay Kulkarni wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/70397/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 5, 2019, 3:09 a.m.) > > > Review request for ranger, Madhan Neethiraj, Pradeep Agrawal, and Ramesh Mani. > > > Bugs: RANGER-2396 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2396 > > > Repository: ranger > > > Description > ------- > > Create or Delete Policy operations in a disabled Ranger service causes > policy-cache for the service to out of sync with the policy database. One > manifestation of this is as seen in this scenario. > > Disable a Ranger service > Delete a policy in the service > Operation is shown as successful, however, the policy listing page still > lists deleted policy, and viewing the policy causes error: 'Policy does not > exist'. > > The root cause of this was that policy-cache was not updated when service was > disabled. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/RangerPolicyEngineImpl.java > 5e10e0d33 > > agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/ServicePolicies.java > 3ce92125e > security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java > 4b1c0c41a > > security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/common/RangerServicePoliciesCache.java > 86b3c004f > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70397/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested the scenario described in a cluster and ensured that the policy > listing page is updated correctly, and deleted policy is not listed on it. > > > Thanks, > > Abhay Kulkarni > >
