-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71615/#review218226
-----------------------------------------------------------




security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/RoleDBStore.java
Lines 125 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71615/#comment305821>

    To be consistent with validation on https://reviews.apache.org/r/71614/ 
check if role is part of other roles.


- Velmurugan Periasamy


On Oct. 15, 2019, 1:54 p.m., Nikhil P wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71615/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 15, 2019, 1:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, 
> Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and 
> Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-2618
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2618
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When we try to delete a role associated with a ranger policy, the operation 
> is not allowed. Likewise, role edit for rolename change also should be 
> restricted.
> Reason:
> Rolename edit is allowed and the ranger policy still exists with old rolename 
> reference. Policy enforcement happens as per old policy. Rolename change is 
> not taken into consideration during policy download.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/RoleDBStore.java 
> dfc5be89d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71615/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested on local vm whether rolename update is restricted if it exists in any 
> policy.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nikhil P
> 
>

Reply via email to