-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71998/#review219291
-----------------------------------------------------------



Can you add the testing done for the fresh and upgrade case.

- Pradeep Agrawal


On Jan. 15, 2020, 2:19 a.m., Jiayi Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71998/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 15, 2020, 2:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, bhavik patel, Gautam Borad, Abhay 
> Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Mehul Parikh, Nikhil P, Nitin Galave, Ramesh 
> Mani, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-2700
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2700
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In Ranger-2.0.0, the request that creating new service often stuck on 
> generateBase64EncodedIV() in PasswordUtils.java. It uses 
> SecureRandom.getInstanceStrong() to get the random string. We can find a lot 
> of information showing that this function often blocks and is very slow. 
> SecureRandom.getInstanceStrong() uses /dev/random, and /dev/random blocks the 
> thread if there isn't enough randomness available, but /dev/urandom will 
> never block.
> 
> SecureRandom.getInstanceStrong() is equivalent to 
> SecureRandom.getInstance("NativePRNGBlocking"), so we can use /dev/urandom by 
> replacing SecureRandom.getInstanceStrong().nextBytes(iv) with 
> SecureRandom.getInstance("NativePRNGNonBlocking").nextBytes(iv) which will 
> not be blocked, or we can use new SecureRandom().nextBytes(iv). /dev/random 
> and /dev/urandom use the same pool of randomness under the hood, and they are 
> equally secure.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PasswordUtils.java 
> c08f55d6e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71998/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiayi Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to