-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72959/#review222042
-----------------------------------------------------------




security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/XGroupUserService.java
Lines 109 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72959/#comment311111>

    Consider moving #109 to inside following for-loop:
    
      for (String userName : users) {
        ...
        
        XXGroupUser xxGroupUser            = groupUsers.get(username);
        boolean     groupUserMappingExists = xxGroupUser != null;
    
        ...
        
        if (groupUserMappingExists) {
          xxGroupUser = getDao().update(xxGroupUser);
        } else {
          xxGroupUser = new XXGroupUser();
          
          ...
          
          xxGroupUser = getDao().create(xxGroupUser);
        }
      }


- Madhan Neethiraj


On Oct. 14, 2020, 1:20 a.m., Sailaja Polavarapu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72959/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 14, 2020, 1:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Abhay Kulkarni, Mahesh Bandal, Mehul Parikh, 
> Ramesh Mani, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3038
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3038
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed issue with group memberships update to ranger admin.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/XGroupUserService.java 
> 74431b0e0 
>   security-admin/src/main/resources/META-INF/jpa_named_queries.xml a8f581849 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72959/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Patched cluster with changes and verified the functionality.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sailaja Polavarapu
> 
>

Reply via email to