> On Jan. 5, 2021, 5:20 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > Bhavik - the changes look good.
> > 
> > This patch adds many 'excludes'; we should follow up with another patch to 
> > remove some of these excludes, along with fix for flagged issues. For 
> > example, removal of should be considered: UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturn, 
> > UnnecessaryModifier, AvoidDollarSigns, UnnecessaryCast, 
> > IdenticalCatchBranches, ConfusingTernary, PrematureDeclaration, 
> > CallSuperInConstructor, ForLoopCanBeForeach, UseCollectionIsEmpty, 
> > UnusedLocalVariable, ForLoopVariableCount, UseTryWithResources, 
> > AvoidUsingHardCodedIP, DoubleCheckedLocking, NonThreadSafeSingleton

yes, that is the final goal.


- bhavik


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72940/#review222403
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 5, 2021, 4:55 a.m., bhavik patel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72940/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 5, 2021, 4:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Dhaval Shah, Gautam Borad, Abhay 
> Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Mehul Parikh, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, 
> sailaja mada, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3028
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3028
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> As a part of a good coding practice upgrade maven PMD plugin version to the 
> latest(3.14.0)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   dev-support/ranger-pmd-ruleset.xml 65a4f1da4 
>   pom.xml f764ac349 
>   ranger-examples/dev-support/ranger-pmd-ruleset.xml 96f566a8b 
>   security-admin/pom.xml 86e46b94b 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72940/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified "mvn pmd:check" successful.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> bhavik patel
> 
>

Reply via email to