jles01 edited a comment on pull request #106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ranger/pull/106#issuecomment-896674819


   > Hi, isn't the current `presto` plugin the one that should work for Trino 
as well? I understand after the Trino name change, there may need to be some 
package name changing, but for the most part there doesn't need to be any 
logical difference or use for the old "presto" plugin. Shouldn't we just rename 
everything in the Presto plugin and make it the official support for Trino?
   
   From my knowledge presto still exists and will be continued. Should we move 
that users outside apache ranger ? I would not be so sure. We can have both or 
only Trino, the question would be how many "presto ranger" users out there
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to