-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/73592/#review223504
-----------------------------------------------------------




agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/resourcematcher/RangerAbstractResourceMatcher.java
Line 87 (original), 91 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/73592/#comment312583>

    Please consider setting optQuotedCaseSensitive thus:
    
                optQuotedCaseSensitive = getOptionQuotedCaseSensitive(options);
    
    It appears that this will not change any semantics of new code using value 
of optQuotedCaseSensitive member variable.


- Abhay Kulkarni


On Sept. 20, 2021, 8:31 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/73592/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 20, 2021, 8:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Abhay Kulkarni, 
> Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, and Sailaja Polavarapu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3420
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3420
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> updated resource matcher with following options, to support quoted identifiers
>   - quotedCaseSensitive
>   - quoteChars
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/resourcematcher/RangerAbstractResourceMatcher.java
>  475453966 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/resourcematcher/ResourceMatcher.java
>  35856a96e 
>   
> agents-common/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/resourcematcher/TestDefaultPolicyResourceMatcher.java
>  8ea71057a 
>   
> agents-common/src/test/resources/resourcematcher/test_defaultpolicyresourcematcher_quoted.json
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/73592/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - added new unit tests to validate the enhancements
> - verified that existing unit tests pass successfully
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Madhan Neethiraj
> 
>

Reply via email to