-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/73900/#review224164
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Mehul Parikh


On March 15, 2022, 12:55 p.m., Dhaval Rajpara wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/73900/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 15, 2022, 12:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Dhaval Shah, Dineshkumar Yadav, Harshal Chavan, 
> Kishor Gollapalliwar, Mateen Mansoori, Mehul Parikh, Nitin Galave, Pradeep 
> Agrawal, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3665
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3665
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In the Ranger web console, when no conditions or exclusions of a certain type 
> are present, a message appears saying "No Data Found !!"
> 
> 
> The wording, capitalization, and punctuation of this message all suggest 
> something is wrong. However, this condition is normal. For example, default 
> policies generally don't include any Deny conditions. Having no Deny 
> conditions isn't a problem, but the message in the UI gives a different 
> impression.
> 
> I suggest replacing the current message that suggests an error with something 
> more low-key. Perhaps it could just say "(None)".
> 
> Or maybe no message at all is needed. Unless an actual error is present, a 
> blank table is probably sufficient to convey that no items of that type are 
> present.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/webapp/templates/policies/RangerPolicyRO_tmpl.html 
> f41557748 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/73900/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Changed the massage to 'No policy Item of "Allow Condition" are present'
> Same for other policy item
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dhaval Rajpara
> 
>

Reply via email to