-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/74144/#review224722
-----------------------------------------------------------




agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/RangerServiceTagsDeltaUtil.java
Line 122 (original), 115 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/74144/#comment313508>

    If the updated resource was added in this set of deltas, then it would 
exist in the resourcesToAdd map. It may be more efficient to check if it exists 
in the resourcesToAdd map, and if it does, then do not add it to 
resourcesToRemove map. Please review.



agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/RangerServiceTagsDeltaUtil.java
Lines 123 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/74144/#comment313507>

    If the resource is added and removed in the same set of deltas, then it may 
be more efficient to check its existence in the resourcesToAdd map before 
removing it. If it existed in resourcesToAdd then there is no need to add it to 
resourcesToRemove map. That can potentially save the execution of loop at line 
138.


- Abhay Kulkarni


On Sept. 29, 2022, 6:46 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/74144/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 29, 2022, 6:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Kishor Gollapalliwar, Abhay 
> Kulkarni, Mehul Parikh, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Sailaja Polavarapu, 
> Subhrat Chaudhary, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3934
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3934
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - updated several retrieval of XXService JPA object by replacing with 
> retrival of serviceId
> - replaced several instances of Map<Long, Long> with Set<Long>, as these 
> instances had same value for key and value
> - avoided expensive calls to RangerTagResourceMapService.getByTagId(tagId) 
> and RangerTagResourceMapService.getTagIdsForResourceId(serviceResourceId)
> - updated several methods in XXTagResourceMapDao to avoid loading of 
> XXTagResourceMap JPA object; instead created XXTagResourceMap object from 
> individial fields retrieved from query
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/RangerServiceTagsDeltaUtil.java
>  8d9241c1c 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TagDBStore.java 
> d8154b7de 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXRMSServiceResourceDao.java
>  afa754ba2 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXServiceDao.java 
> 3cc3d9cef 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXTagResourceMapDao.java 
> 3f8b5b718 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/patch/PatchForAtlasServiceDefUpdate_J10013.java
>  b0f71e138 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/TagREST.java c7cf3bfb8 
>   security-admin/src/main/resources/META-INF/jpa_named_queries.xml e4a2354b0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/74144/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - with Ranger database having ~1m service-resources, ~2m tags and delta of 
> 20k resource & 40k tags:
>   -- before these optmizations, tag-cache update from delta didn't complete 
> event after a long time (1h35m)
>   -- with these optmizations, tag-cache update from the same delta completed 
> within 10 minutes
> - there is scope for further optimization 
> RangerServiceTagsDeltaUtil.applyDelta() - as this took almost 97% time in 
> updating the cache (588 seconds); compare this to 
> TagDBStore.getServiceTagsDelta() which completed in 13 seeconds
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Madhan Neethiraj
> 
>

Reply via email to