-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/74170/#review224798
-----------------------------------------------------------




embeddedwebserver/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/server/tomcat/SolrCollectionBootstrapper.java
Lines 204 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/74170/#comment313629>

    Should set solrCloudClient to null after close? Also what happens if we set 
to null, would it get created again?



embeddedwebserver/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/server/tomcat/SolrCollectionBootstrapper.java
Lines 207 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/74170/#comment313630>

    1. Any reason we are setting this as severe? Can we use the level WARN or 
ERROR?
    2. Can we pass the exception as parameter to the logger?


- Don Bosco Durai


On Oct. 14, 2022, 3:07 p.m., Sai Sandeep Rangisetti wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/74170/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 14, 2022, 3:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3947
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3947
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Closing the solr cloud client in SolrCollectionBootstrapper's retry loop of 
> creating solr config and collection. Without this new solr cloud client is 
> created in every loop and new connection pools which will not be cleaned up 
> and create large number of threads
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> embeddedwebserver/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/server/tomcat/SolrCollectionBootstrapper.java
>  fe4006f76 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/74170/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran ranger-admin without ranger_audit config in zk and no 
> contrib/solr_for_audit_setup/conf file which leads to retry loop and verified 
> that threads aren't increasinng
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sai Sandeep Rangisetti
> 
>

Reply via email to