> On Feb. 17, 2023, 11:17 p.m., Abhishek  Kumar wrote:
> > intg/src/main/python/apache_ranger/client/ranger_client.py
> > Line 197 (original)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/74305/diff/1/?file=2274634#file2274634line197>
> >
> >     Is this getting deprecated ?
> 
> Abhishek  Kumar wrote:
>     I think this removal would be required in java client as well.

Yes. Let's track Java client updates with a separate patch.


- Madhan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/74305/#review225192
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 12, 2023, 10:02 p.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/74305/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 12, 2023, 10:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Abhishek  Kumar, Ankita Sinha, Kishor 
> Gollapalliwar, Abhay Kulkarni, Mehul Parikh, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, 
> Sailaja Polavarapu, Subhrat Chaudhary, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-4080
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-4080
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - added methods get_security_zone_headers() and 
> get_security_zone_service_headers(zone_id)
> - removed method update_security_zone(zone_name, zone), as REST endpoint 
> doesn't exist at the server side
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   intg/src/main/python/README.md 46de769fc 
>   intg/src/main/python/apache_ranger/client/ranger_client.py 260095b2f 
>   intg/src/main/python/apache_ranger/model/ranger_security_zone.py 3056b7ed5 
>   intg/src/main/python/apache_ranger/model/ranger_service.py a3d273c20 
>   intg/src/main/python/apache_ranger/utils.py b3c568f1f 
>   intg/src/main/python/setup.py 5222d7153 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/74305/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - verified the new methods return correct values with a sample client
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Madhan Neethiraj
> 
>

Reply via email to