[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-4697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Anand Nadar updated RANGER-4697:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a datashare DSH-1, with zone1 and service1
2. Now download the GDS cache for service1. Note down the gds version as well 
(The response has the security zone name)
3. Now modify the zoneName to zone-test.
4. Now check the response of GDS cache download api, it's gds version would not 
be incremented and it will also contain the old security zone name.
5. Due to this the access enforcement fails.

When the zone name is modified, then the gds version is not updated. (Because 
the datshare object contains the zoneID and therefore the zone name change does 
not affect the object)
However, the GDS cache contains the security zone name which is used to 
evaluate access. 

But this new change of zone name is not taken by the cache because the service 
specific gds version is not updated. And because of this the access enforcement 
fails for GDS policies.

Resolution: 
To address this issue, upon modification of the security-zone, the 
service-specific GDS versions for all services associated with that particular 
zone must be updated, if they are associated with a datashare.

  was:
Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a datashare DSH-1, with zone1 and service1
2. Now download the GDS cache for service1. Note down the gds version as well 
(The response has the security zone name)
3. Now modify the zoneName to zone-test.
4. Now check the response of GDS cache download api, it's gds version would not 
be incremented and it will also contain the old security zone name.
5. Due to this the access enforcement fails.

When the zone name is modified, then the gds version is not updated. (Because 
the datshare object contains the zoneID and therefore the zone name change does 
not affect the object)
However, the GDS cache contains the security zone name which is used to 
evaluate access. 

But this new change of zone name is not taken by the cache because the service 
specific gds version is not updated. And because of this the access enforcement 
fails for GDS policies.

Resolution: 
To address this issue, upon modification of the zone name, the service-specific 
GDS versions for all services associated with that particular zone must be 
updated, if they are associated with a datashare.


> GDS: The GDS cache is not updated when the name of a security zone is 
> modified which is linked with a datashare
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RANGER-4697
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-4697
>             Project: Ranger
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: admin
>            Reporter: Anand Nadar
>            Assignee: Anand Nadar
>            Priority: Major
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Create a datashare DSH-1, with zone1 and service1
> 2. Now download the GDS cache for service1. Note down the gds version as well 
> (The response has the security zone name)
> 3. Now modify the zoneName to zone-test.
> 4. Now check the response of GDS cache download api, it's gds version would 
> not be incremented and it will also contain the old security zone name.
> 5. Due to this the access enforcement fails.
> When the zone name is modified, then the gds version is not updated. (Because 
> the datshare object contains the zoneID and therefore the zone name change 
> does not affect the object)
> However, the GDS cache contains the security zone name which is used to 
> evaluate access. 
> But this new change of zone name is not taken by the cache because the 
> service specific gds version is not updated. And because of this the access 
> enforcement fails for GDS policies.
> Resolution: 
> To address this issue, upon modification of the security-zone, the 
> service-specific GDS versions for all services associated with that 
> particular zone must be updated, if they are associated with a datashare.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to