mneethiraj commented on code in PR #410:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ranger/pull/410#discussion_r1830508529


##########
agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerDefaultPolicyEvaluator.java:
##########
@@ -1512,4 +1504,27 @@ private List<RangerConditionEvaluator> 
createPolicyConditionEvaluators(RangerPol
                return ret;
        }
 
+       private static boolean isMatchForResourceMatchingScope(final 
RangerAccessRequest.ResourceMatchingScope scope, final 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType matchType, boolean isAnyMatch) {
+               boolean ret = false;
+               if (isAnyMatch){
+                       ret = matchType !=  
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;
+               }
+               else if (scope!=null) {
+                               switch (scope) {
+                                               case SELF_OR_DESCENDANTS: {
+                                                       ret = matchType != 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;
+                                                       break;
+                                               }
+                                               case SELF_AND_ALL_DESCENDANTS: {
+                                                       ret = matchType != 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;
+                                                       break;
+                                               }
+                                               default: {
+                                                       ret = matchType == 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.SELF || matchType == 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.SELF_AND_ALL_DESCENDANTS;
+                                                       break;
+                                               }
+                               }
+               }

Review Comment:
   when scope is null, shouldn't the return be true if matchType is SELF or 
SELF_AND_ALL_DESCENDANTS?



##########
agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerDefaultPolicyEvaluator.java:
##########
@@ -1512,4 +1504,27 @@ private List<RangerConditionEvaluator> 
createPolicyConditionEvaluators(RangerPol
                return ret;
        }
 
+       private static boolean isMatchForResourceMatchingScope(final 
RangerAccessRequest.ResourceMatchingScope scope, final 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType matchType, boolean isAnyMatch) {
+               boolean ret = false;
+               if (isAnyMatch){
+                       ret = matchType !=  
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;
+               }
+               else if (scope!=null) {
+                               switch (scope) {
+                                               case SELF_OR_DESCENDANTS: {
+                                                       ret = matchType != 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;

Review Comment:
   when scope is SELF_OR_DESCENDENTS, is it okay to return true when matchType 
is ANCESTOR?



##########
agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerDefaultPolicyEvaluator.java:
##########
@@ -1512,4 +1504,27 @@ private List<RangerConditionEvaluator> 
createPolicyConditionEvaluators(RangerPol
                return ret;
        }
 
+       private static boolean isMatchForResourceMatchingScope(final 
RangerAccessRequest.ResourceMatchingScope scope, final 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType matchType, boolean isAnyMatch) {
+               boolean ret = false;
+               if (isAnyMatch){
+                       ret = matchType !=  
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;
+               }
+               else if (scope!=null) {
+                               switch (scope) {
+                                               case SELF_OR_DESCENDANTS: {
+                                                       ret = matchType != 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;
+                                                       break;
+                                               }
+                                               case SELF_AND_ALL_DESCENDANTS: {
+                                                       ret = matchType != 
RangerPolicyResourceMatcher.MatchType.NONE;

Review Comment:
   shouldn't matchType be SELF_AND_ALL_DESCENDENTS here?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ranger.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to