-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33069/#review79659
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Gautam Borad


On April 10, 2015, 7:53 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33069/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 10, 2015, 7:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Selvamohan 
> Neethiraj, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-387
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-387
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> RANGER-387: fixed inconsistent getter/setter names for RangerServiceDef.name
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/model/RangerServiceDef.java
>  87fab8f 
>   agents-common/src/main/resources/service-defs/ranger-servicedef-hbase.json 
> f860f1d 
>   agents-common/src/main/resources/service-defs/ranger-servicedef-hdfs.json 
> e0800fe 
>   agents-common/src/main/resources/service-defs/ranger-servicedef-hive.json 
> 8b68e99 
>   agents-common/src/main/resources/service-defs/ranger-servicedef-kms.json 
> 2ca22f4 
>   agents-common/src/main/resources/service-defs/ranger-servicedef-knox.json 
> cd6401a 
>   agents-common/src/main/resources/service-defs/ranger-servicedef-storm.json 
> fd51fea 
>   agents-common/src/main/resources/service-defs/ranger-servicedef-yarn.json 
> 5d8b989 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/PublicAPIsv2.java 
> 2094228 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/RangerServiceDefServiceBase.java
>  632869f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33069/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified that build and unit tests succeed after the method rename.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Madhan Neethiraj
> 
>

Reply via email to