----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35142/#review86820 -----------------------------------------------------------
pom.xml <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35142/#comment138914> How stable are these RC build URLs? Should this reference have to be updated frequently?? pom.xml <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35142/#comment138913> "lucene-solr-5.2.0-RC4-rev1683206" ==> consider replacing with a property like "solr.version.url" (similar to solr.version). - Madhan Neethiraj On June 5, 2015, 5:25 p.m., Don Bosco Durai wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/35142/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 5, 2015, 5:25 p.m.) > > > Review request for ranger, Madhan Neethiraj and Selvamohan Neethiraj. > > > Bugs: RANGER-178 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-178 > > > Repository: ranger > > > Description > ------- > > RANGER-178 Enable building of Solr Authorization plugin > > > Diffs > ----- > > plugin-solr/pom.xml e49865e > pom.xml 124d49e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35142/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Manual testing > > > Thanks, > > Don Bosco Durai > >
