-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35188/#review86988
-----------------------------------------------------------



security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/common/db/BaseDao.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35188/#comment139200>

    Not sure why we want nextValue - 1. Shouldn't it be INCREMENT by 1


- Don Bosco Durai


On June 7, 2015, 6:04 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35188/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 7, 2015, 6:04 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Selvamohan 
> Neethiraj, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-537
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-537
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> next-ID sequence updated after creating service-id with pre-defined ID
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/RangerBizUtil.java 
> 2cae01d 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 
> e213937 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/common/AppConstants.java 
> 59ab3db 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/common/db/BaseDao.java 
> 8ef9e08 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXPolicyDao.java 9901832 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXServiceDao.java 4f35ad3 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXServiceDefDao.java 
> 1affbf7 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/patch/PatchMigration_J10002.java
>  c33b39d 
>   security-admin/src/main/resources/META-INF/jpa_named_queries.xml 054a0bd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35188/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified that creation of service-def without pre-defined ID goes through 
> successfully.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Madhan Neethiraj
> 
>

Reply via email to