I thought there was a recent change to use log4j.properties. Not sure whether 
it was committed recently.

FYI, I have been using log4j for logging. But I agree, we should standardize on 
one.

Bryan, on the plugin side, we should use whatever the component uses.

Thanks

Bosco




On 4/20/16, 10:20 AM, "Ramesh Mani" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Bryan,
>
>I have seen bothlog4j and slf4j being used in Ranger. Many of the new
>codes uses slf4j.
>
>For Ranger admin ews/webapp/WEB-INF/log4j.xml is the right one and there
>is xa_log_appender for ranger.
>
><category name="org.apache.ranger" additivity="false">
>               <priority value="info" />
>               <appender-ref ref="xa_log_appender" />
>       </category>
>
>
>Thanks,
>Ramesh
>
>On 4/20/16, 10:09 AM, "Bryan Bende" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Two questions regarding logging in Ranger...
>>
>>1) Should code running in Ranger use commons logging to get a logger?
>       
>>
>>It appears log4j and slf4j are on the classpath, but most existing code
>>seems to use commons logging, just wanted to confirm.
>>
>>2) Which logging configuration file does Ranger admin webapp use?
>>
>>I tried modifying ews/webapp/WEB-INF/log4j.xml and restarting the webapp,
>>but didn't see any logging for my package.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Bryan
>

Reply via email to