-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46768/#review130915
-----------------------------------------------------------



Colm - can you please confirm that the HDFS plugin generated with this update 
works without running into any issues? If you verified this, the patch is good 
to go. Thanks.

- Madhan Neethiraj


On April 28, 2016, 10:48 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46768/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 28, 2016, 10:48 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger.
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some minor changes following a review of the HDFS code:
> 
> a) Remove unnecessary dependencies in both the HDFS shim + plugin
> b) Some trivial changes to the RangerHdfsAuthorizer - use an empty Set for 
> FS.NONE instead of creating a new Set + use an existing constructor for the 
> RangerHdfsAccessRequest.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   hdfs-agent/pom.xml f5e42eb 
>   
> hdfs-agent/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/authorization/hadoop/RangerHdfsAuthorizer.java
>  93dca87 
>   ranger-hdfs-plugin-shim/pom.xml 0522697 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46768/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> 
>

Reply via email to