[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15264888#comment-15264888
 ] 

Madhan Neethiraj edited comment on RANGER-960 at 4/29/16 11:21 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Fix committed to master: 
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ranger/commit/1fc84ff6
Fix committed to ranger-0.5: 
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ranger/commit/0fef5d86


was (Author: madhan.neethiraj):
Fix committed to master: 
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ranger/commit/1fc84ff6

> Service-def update does not preserve the order in which permissions are listed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RANGER-960
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-960
>             Project: Ranger
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: admin
>    Affects Versions: 0.5.0, 0.6.0
>            Reporter: Madhan Neethiraj
>            Assignee: Madhan Neethiraj
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-RANGER-960-service-def-update-should-preserve-the-pe.patch
>
>
> Consider a Hive policy - the policy UI lists the permissions in the following 
> order: select, update, create, drop, alter, index, lock, all.
> After an update to Hive service-def (for example to add a custom-condition), 
> the policy UI lists the permission in a different order.
> For a better user experience and consistency, service-def updates should 
> preserve the ordering of the permissions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to