-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55008/#review160236
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




I applied the patch it applies cleanly and hand checked callers of the two 
functions being changed.  

Outside of the two nits, changes are good.  In anticipation of that fix I'm 
giving my ship-it to the patch.

- Alok Lal


On Dec. 22, 2016, 10:54 p.m., Qiang Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55008/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 22, 2016, 10:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Madhan Reddy, Ramesh Mani, 
> Selvamohan Neethiraj, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1280
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1280
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I failed to run the ranger-admin command and couldn't find any error messages 
> in log file after set 
> ranger.service.http.connector.attrib.maxHeaderCount=aa(string value) in 
> ranger-admin-site.xml file. I analyzed the source codes and found the reason.
> I found there are two questions after check the source codes in 
> EmbeddedServer.java.
> 1. No exception pop out when called Integer.parseInt() and Long.parseLong() 
> function. Once abnormal, the program aborted directly without log.
> 2. The catch captures anomaly without log in the loadConfig function. It only 
> calls e.printStackTrace() function.
> 
> Currently the program will be aborted when the exception occured. We should 
> get the default value instead of aborted.
> 
> We have tested our patch strictly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> embeddedwebserver/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/server/tomcat/EmbeddedServer.java
>  7ebba8a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55008/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qiang Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to