Hi Yaolong,

Thanks for letting me know the current status. Hoping everything works out fine 
for 2.4.0 :)

Regards,
William

> 2022年9月8日 12:59,Yaolong Liu <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> Hi William,
> 
> 
> Since Ratis 2.4.0 plans to introduce RATIS-1677 and RATIS-1694, which is 
> currently in the test phase, so the release progress is temporarily blocked. 
> see https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/718
> 
> 
> -Yaolong
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 2022-09-08 10:28:04, "William Song" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Tsz-wo,
>> 
>> Thanks for confirming this! Hoping this fix can catch 2.4.0 release. 
>> 
>> BTW, I see that the community has closed Release 2.4.0-rc1 voting process 
>> due to compatibility issues. What is the current progress? Our community 
>> (IoTDB) plans to release a major version 0.14.0, which relies on features 
>> that will introduced in 2.4.0. Please let me know if there’s anything we can 
>> help.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> William
>> 
>>> 2022年9月8日 08:31,Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 写道:
>>> 
>>> Hi William,
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot for reporting the problem!  Fortunately, the race
>>> condition happens during shutdown since "SegmentRaftLog is closed" as
>>> mentioned in the description of RATIS-1699.  Of course, we would like
>>> to fix it.  I will check it for more details.
>>> 
>>> Tsz-Wo
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:39 PM William Song <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> We found abnormal behaviors of GrpcLogAppender in a recent run, please 
>>>> refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1699 
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1699> for detailed error log 
>>>> and problem description.
>>>> 
>>>> We think that this problem roots in the data race in LeaderStateImpl. Its 
>>>> method stop() and restart(LogAppender) can be called concurrently, and 
>>>> under certain event sequence, will cause this weird situation. Maybe we 
>>>> can add synchronizations to coordinate these two methods. The event 
>>>> sequence and full logs are also provided in this issue.
>>>> 
>>>> Please help me to confirm whether our analysis stands. Thanks in advance!
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> William

Reply via email to