Thanks Yaolong for working on this.

Just curious, why does the sha512 file use an uncommon format?
The content itself is correct, btw.

$ shasum -c apache-ratis-2.4.0-src.tar.gz.sha512 
shasum: apache-ratis-2.4.0-src.tar.gz.sha512: no properly formatted SHA 
checksum lines found

Example of the conventional format:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/spark/spark-3.3.0/SparkR_3.3.0.tar.gz.sha512
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/hadoop-3.3.4/hadoop-3.3.4-site.tar.gz.sha512

$ shasum -c hadoop-3.3.4-site.tar.gz.sha512
hadoop-3.3.4-site.tar.gz: OK
$ shasum -c SparkR_3.3.0.tar.gz.sha512     
SparkR_3.3.0.tar.gz: OK

Thanks,
Kaijie

 ---- On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:40:02 +0800  William Song  wrote --- 
 > Thanks for working on this.
 > 
 > +1 (non-binding)
 > 
 > * Verified git hash
 > * Built Ratis from source locally
 > * Updated Ratis version in IoTDB and ran tests
 > 
 > William
 > 
 > > 2022年10月10日 21:23,Yaolong Liu [email protected]> 写道:
 > > 
 > > Hi all,
 > > 
 > > 
 > > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis Release 2.4.0 rc5.  Compared to rc4, 
 > > this
 > > round of release fix bin tarball LICENCE related issue.
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > The git tag to be voted upon:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > https://github.com/apache/ratis/tree/ratis-2.4.0-rc5
 > > 
 > > 
 > > The git commit hash:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 48cba75f6458900ff7365dcdcc76242442b7b004
 > > 
 > > 
 > > The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/2.4.0/rc5
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 444D 29C9 DEEF A0E7 3D90 4BA5 2973 DD33 3371 E759
 > > 
 > > 
 > > My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/KEYS
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Maven artifacts are staged at:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1129/
 > > 
 > > 
 > > This vote will remain open for 7 days.
 > > 
 > > 
 > > [ ] +1 approve
 > > 
 > > 
 > > [ ] +0 no opinion
 > > 
 > > 
 > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Starting with my +1 (binding):
 > > 
 > > 
 > > * Verified checksum, signature, git hash
 > > 
 > > 
 > > * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE
 > > 
 > > 
 > > * Compared source tarball to repo at the given tag
 > > 
 > > 
 > > * Built from source
 > > 
 > > 
 > > * Ran regular Ratis CI [1]
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
 > > 
 > > 
 > > -Yaolong
 > > 
 > > 
 > > [1] https://github.com/codings-dan/incubator-ratis/actions/runs/3219400787
 > 
 > 

Reply via email to