> The git commit hash:
> c6bf1d5a6a22453f8cfaf31e6f65ee7c9dad8502

The git commit hash indeed is be0fcc6ae58cf123a42dcc68495e8d48866a5990 .

+1
- Verified all checksums and signatures.
- Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
- Compared the files in the src tarball with the files in git
(be0fcc6ae58cf123a42dcc68495e8d48866a5990).
- Checked the files in [TAG].  The extracted source files are the same as
the files in [DIST].
- Built from source successfully.
- Passed all unit tests.

[DIST]  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/thirdparty/1.0.5/rc0
[TAG]   https://github.com/apache/ratis-thirdparty/releases/tag/1.0.5-rc0

Thanks a lot for working on the release!

Tsz-Wo


On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 2:22 AM Attila Doroszlai <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks William for working on the release.
>
> > - Verified checksum, signature, git hash
> > - Compared tarball to repo at the given tag
> > - Built from source
> > - Built Ratis locally with 1.0.5-rc0 after updating component versions
> [1]
> > - Ran regular Ratis CI using the staged third-party jars [2]
>
> +1
>
> Performed the same checks as listed above.  (I also changed
> `shaded.protobuf.version` and `shaded.grpc.version` to match those in
> the new third-party POM.)
>
> https://github.com/adoroszlai/ratis/actions/runs/6690151433
>
> -Attila
>

Reply via email to