Thanks Attila for preparing the release!

+1
* Verified git hash, checksum and signatures
* Built from source
* Regular ratis UT passed locally
* Ran IoTDB with staged jars and passed UT 
(some failures on lease read, expected since new fixes introduced in 3.0.1)

Happy new year!

William

> 2023年12月29日 18:36,Attila Doroszlai <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> Hi Ratis developers,
> 
> All items mentioned in our previous discussion thread [1] as required
> for 3.0.1 were fixed or postponed.
> 
> Therefore I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis Release 3.0.1 rc0.
> 
> The git tag to be voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/ratis/tree/ratis-3.0.1-rc0
> 
> The git commit hash:
> e6f2554610941d8ca18aee6df1d5c0e78275a003
> 
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/3.0.1/rc0/
> 
> Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with:
> 0949 35E7 9D62 A9C4 A969  CCE2 B629 7DE9 82CF 1F4E
> 
> My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ratis/KEYS
> 
> Maven artifacts are staged at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1143/
> 
> This vote will remain open for 11 days (to account for end-of-year holidays).
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Starting with my +1 (binding):
> 
> * Verified checksum, signature, git hash
> * Compared source tarball to repo at the given tag
> * Ran Rat check on source
> * Built from source
> * Regular CI passed for the ratis-3.0.1-rc0 tag [2]
> * Ran regular Ozone CI using the staged jars [3] (passed, except
> license check, which timed out, but it's not relevant)
> 
> Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
> 
> -Attila
> 
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1t2n2h0cnn2kt1v0v8g0sbcxcn5s1qss
> [2] https://github.com/apache/ratis/actions/runs/7355547758
> [3] https://github.com/adoroszlai/ozone/actions/runs/7355126097

Reply via email to