Hi Tsz-Wo, Thanks a lot for publishing the 3.3.0-b60fcf6-SNAPSHOT.
This version works for us. We will use this snapshot version to perform integration testing on the IoTDB side. We will report back if we find any issues during the testing. Best regards, Haonan On 2026/06/04 14:53:20 Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > Hi Haonan, > > > From the Apache IoTDB side, we are mainly interested in the following two > gRPC-related improvements: > > Would it work if we roll the next release from the current master? It also > contains some important bug fixes such as RATIS-2499 (see this comment [2]). > > > Would it be possible to publish a SNAPSHOT version containing these > changes first? ... > > Sure, just have deployed a 3.3.0-b60fcf6-SNAPSHOT [1]. Please try. It is > over the current master commit b60fcf6 (RATIS-2552). Deploying snapshots > is very easy. Please feel free to let us know. > > Tsz-Wo > [1] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/ratis/ratis-bom/3.3.0-b60fcf6-SNAPSHOT/ > [2] https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/1425#pullrequestreview-4070436127 > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 12:35 AM Haonan Hou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Xinyu and Tsz-Wo, > > > > Thanks for the discussion and for driving the next release forward. > > > > From the Apache IoTDB side, we are mainly interested in the following two > > gRPC-related > > improvements: > > > > * RATIS-2529: Bound gRPC worker EventLoopGroup thread count > > * RATIS-2537: Support configurable gRPC TLS provider and cipher suites > > > > Both are important for us in production deployments. RATIS-2529 helps > > avoid unexpected long- > > lived gRPC worker thread inflation after follower restart/catch-up, and > > RATIS-2537 allows > > downstream projects to use specific TLS/JSSE providers, protocols, and > > cipher suites when > > required by deployment or compliance environments. > > > > Since these two issues were fixed and are important for our downstream > > integration, we would > > like to verify them on the IoTDB side. > > > > Would it be possible to publish a SNAPSHOT version containing these > > changes first? With a > > SNAPSHOT build available, we can upgrade the Ratis dependency in IoTDB and > > perform > > integration testing before the official release. > > > > Best, > > Haonan > > > > On 2026/06/04 00:35:09 Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze wrote: > > > Hi Haonan, > > > > > > > We are currently tracking some recent changes in Ratis ... > > > > > > Could you share the changes? > > > > > > Sorry that Ratis releases do not have a concrete schedule -- We usually > > > release on demand, and if there is no demand, we release around twice a > > > year. If there is a need, we could roll a release right away. Please > > feel > > > free to let us know. > > > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 4:05 AM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Haonan, > > > > > > > > Thanks for reaching out. > > > > > > > > The latest Ratis release, 3.2.2, was published on April 3, 2026. It has > > > > been about two months since then. Looking at the current diff from > > > > release-3.2.2 to master, the accumulated changes do not look very > > large at > > > > this point, so we do not have a fixed timeline for the next release > > yet. > > > > > > > > That said, we can certainly evaluate the timing based on downstream > > > > community needs. If there are specific fixes or changes that your > > > > downstream project is waiting for, please let us know which ones are > > > > important for your upgrade plan. That would help us decide whether it > > makes > > > > sense to start preparing the next release sooner. > > > > > > > > Help with testing and verification would also be very welcome once we > > > > identify the target changes for the next release. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Xinyu Tan > > > > > > > > On 2026/06/01 06:36:04 Haonan Hou wrote: > > > > > Hi Ratis community, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to ask whether there is any plan or estimated timeline > > for > > > > the next Apache Ratis > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > We are currently tracking some recent changes in Ratis and would > > like to > > > > understand when they > > > > > might become available in an official release, so that we can better > > > > plan our downstream > > > > > dependency upgrade. > > > > > > > > > > Please let us know if there is already a planned release schedule, > > or if > > > > any help is needed with > > > > > testing or verification for the upcoming release. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Haonan Hou > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
