Thanks for creating a new release Marton. +1 Tested Ozone with latest ratis and ran data I/O operation using Freon.
Thanks, Mukul On 22/05/18, 7:22 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" <[email protected]> wrote: Moving my vote to the right thread. +1 Downloaded the source, verified signatures and ran some unit tests. On 5/21/18, 3:09 PM, "Venkat" <[email protected]> wrote: +1 Checked sigatures/hashes. The archive name does not have apache prefix - already raised in this vote thread. Built and ran tests - there were some timeouts running ratis servers tests in a couple of runs (could be environmental issues) , but all tests passed in a subsequent execution. . Venkat On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Jakob Homan <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * Checked sigs/hash > * Spot checked tests > * Checked on the copyright year (thanks) > * Built per instructions, which worked this time. > > Nit: > * Didn't notice this last time, but the artifacts should > apache-ratis-incubator-0.2.0-src.tar.gz rather than > ratis-incubator-0.2.0-src.tar.gz. The IPMC will likely let this slide > until the next release. > > -Jakob > > > On 18 May 2018 at 11:20, Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Marton. >> >> We can generate mds by "gpg --print-mds <file>". See also >> ratis/dev-support/make_rc.sh >> >> Tsz-Wo >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Elek, Marton <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I just found (thanks to RATIS-241) that the previous release provided mds >>> files as checksum. So I just added mds files as well (you can see that the >>> sha hash is the same). >>> >>> But as I don't know any easy method to verify the mds files [1] I would link >>> the sha-512 from the ratis web page. >>> >>> Please check the release candidate and vote. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Marton >>> >>> [1] >>> https://superuser.com/questions/1117048/how-to-verify-checksum-in-a-mds-file-format >>> >>> >>> >>> On 05/16/2018 11:50 PM, Elek, Marton wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to restart the vote to release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 as >>>> we fixed all the previously discussed issues. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This is the second incubator release and it includes more than 120 >>>> improvements and fixes since the previous 0.1.0-alpha release. This is the >>>> first release >>>> which includes a binary package with ready to use example project. >>>> >>>> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be >>>> found at: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc1 >>>> >>>> Staged artifacts can be found at: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1004 >>>> >>>> >>>> This release has been signed with PGP key 0EE79B28, corresponding to >>>> [email protected], which is included in the repository's KEYS file >>>> (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS). >>>> >>>> This key can be found on keyservers, such as: >>>> >>>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0EE79B28 >>>> >>>> Or in the apache phonebook: >>>> >>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elek.asc >>>> >>>> >>>> The release candidate has been tagged in git with ratis-0.2.0-rc1 >>>> (bd234f25c29e918ad3db88bfedcc2d6931221a3e) >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.2.0-rc1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> If the vote passed, the second stage vote will be called on the Apache >>>> incubator mailing list to get approval from the Incubator PMC. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> # Review/testing >>>> >>>> You can check the usual requirements of an apache release: >>>> >>>> • Signatures >>>> • Checksums >>>> • License and notice files >>>> • Disclaimer file (incubator!) >>>> • Build the project from the source code package (mvn clean install >>>> assembly:single -DskipTests=true ) >>>> • Licence headers >>>> >>>> The binary papckage can be smoketested with: >>>> >>>> ./examples/bin/start-all.sh >>>> ./examples/bin/client.sh assign --name a --value 2 >>>> ./examples/bin/client.sh get --name a >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Starting with my vote: +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Marton
