I will commit RATIS-510 Tez. Thanks, Rajeshbabu.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 3:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected] wrote: > All RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490 are now committed. However, we > need RATIS-510 (missing Apache license header) or revert RATIS-475 > from branch-0.3. > > Will see if we can roll a release tomorrow. > > Thanks. > Tsz-Wo > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jitendra Pandey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3 are > > included: > > RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker in > > my opinion. > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know > > > if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks. > > > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3 > > > > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes. > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1, > > > > > > > > > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create > > > the 0.3 > > > > > branch). > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in > master to > > > > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> +1 > > > > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to > be in > > > 0.3 as > > > > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current > > > trunk. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Hi Marton, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move > > > everything in > > > > > > >> trunk to 0.3? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Tsz-Wo > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Hi, > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Any comment on this? > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release? > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > > > >>> Marton > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next > ozone > > > release. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest > master? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > > > >>>> Marton > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> Hi, > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How > about > > > we start > > > > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release? > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. > > > Then, we can > > > > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote. > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
