-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Would it be better to use mvn cargo:run? This may need an upgrade to cargo.
Marlon On 4/13/12 3:41 PM, Jacob Hilker wrote: > Hi All, > > While helping set up a local instance of rave on one of my > co-workers machines, we ran into an issue where using mvn > cargo:start was taking longer than 3 minutes, the default timeout, > and thus failing. > > The fix was simple enough, as we just up'ed the timeout period, and > as such, he successfully deployed rave in approximately 4.5 > minutes. > > However this raises the question of if a preemptive fix for other > new users should be added to the rave codebase, upping the default > timeout period to 5 minutes, or even higher? I'm sure there will > be other users with slower than average machines attempting to > deploy rave. > > rave-portal/pom.xml line 195: <timeout>180000</timeout> > > Thanks, > > Jacob Hilker > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPiIlPAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDtBMIAICYOvgCMq3IDle8Y+HOSd6p Y4aymH5MUpAt+S1rjFdGyUfrfgAp9ct3HdhDoJtHB2izggLSePzGAY7x0Xh+EFDP eHLtUixLLvaBZugyD/nRLpfeCi4L8E0CusO/t0xjXg4hXjzifuJ1LiQ0gkaFZkpS YW5/vBln8/OD4o+6a4CHmHFI2cqXLhEhCdt53Lkx5V2G8pSjXXIPL7eH6RCPU4e0 IyWSiPPmB2n4AytM3mCUt6/fsyY4yEPdMAJXQI6y5cGxZP/0Uza+gZfXW9RJYrMi xFLYZYz/pjbn4BX/t735K7Ol6Tj94MUFoU5wTc4xbIvbT3H0h9IkI0dpAJjx6mg= =LwoZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
