On 05/15/2012 02:31 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Now that the bootstrap branch has been integrated into trunk, it needs to be deleted. Assuming lazy consensus, I will delete the branch today or tomorrow.
Although I don't really have an objection to delete that branch, why would it 'need' to be deleted?
Commonly branches are simply left as they are, retaining east access to their history for who might need to review it still sometime later. In this case that might not be so much of a need for, so I'm personally fine with deleting this branch (or not). But for the more generic case I think it might be better not making that a default/expected process.
Ate
-Matt
