On 11/7/12 1:54 PM, "Nune Isabekyan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi, > >I have been looking into the code from mongoDB integration and I have a >question whether it was an intentional decision not to use @Document >annotation for mapping with Collection...Correct me if I am wrong you >decided to keep the className in the collection and serialize/deserialize >that manually...I am just wondering why... The class name is an attribute of the document and is used for deserialization. We are just using a static string to specify the collection. The choice to not use the @Document annotation was made because there are a few instances where we just use the Rave impl classes, which are not in the Rave mongodb project. As far as I am aware, the annotation only helps specify the collection to save it in. Is there another benefit? > >Thanks in advance. > >Regards, >Nune
