On 2/12/13 1:51 PM, "Chris Geer" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Matt Franklin
><[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Noe-Payne, Erin A. <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I wanted to propose adding underscore.js (http://underscorejs.org/) as
>> a dependency for rave javascript.
>> >
>> > This is a small (4kb) utility belt library for javascript that adds a
>> number of convenience functions without modifying object prototypes. The
>> main advantages would be 1) more succinct code 2) better performance by
>> taking advantage of ecmascript 5 functions like Object.each, .map,
>>.keys,
>> etc when available.
>> >
>> > Are there any objections to adding underscore as a dependency and
>> relying on it for new features going forward / refactoring older js to
>>take
>> advantage of it?
>>
>
>It looks like in RAVE-886 [1] we are adding handlebars support and now
>underscorejs. Are there any frameworks that provide all the capabilities
>we
>think we might need like EmberJS or AngularJS? Do we have a master list of
>all the javascript libraries we use already?

Chris, that is correct. I am looking to do a refactor of rave's js to
isolate dependencies better - these tickets are the first steps. I do not
see rave as a good candidate for ember, angular, backbone or another mv*
framework because it relies on shindig for a lot of its functionality and
the integration would be messy. Also these frameworks look to handle logic
in their controllers, which would tightly couple rave's core js with those
libraries and basically force an implementer into using them.

My end goal would be for rave's core js to have a dependency on
underscore.js only - taking advantage of its utility  and ecmascript 5
polyfills for better readability and performance in the core.

Any dependency on dom libraries (jquery, handlebars) would be refactored
into the rave.ui namespace and file(s) so that an implementer can easily
extend or overlay their ui work and even drop those dependencies without
affecting rave-core.

>
>[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-886
>
>>
>> If it is the only dependency of rave.js and it provides a lot of
>> convenience functions that we would have to write, I am +0
>>
>> >
>> > Erin
>>

Reply via email to