It will allow wicket to serialize the models instead of storing them in memory. So they can be persisted to disk over requests.
I will try to submit a patch with a bug request (improvement). El mié, 27-02-2013 a las 15:13 -0700, Chris Geer escribió: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Matt Franklin > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 27, 2013, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > What do you think about adding "implements Serializable" to all model > > > classes. > > > > > > It will be great since they will express the serializable condition of > > > this classes. If it does not break anything will help a lot. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Conceptually, I would be on board with this. Other thoughts? > > > > I can't think of any reason why this would break anything. Serialized model > objects would allow us to do things like ehcache if needed.
