In other words, I would propose fixing the logged issues and re-spinning the 0.21 release. Thoughts?
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Erin Noe-Payne <[email protected]> wrote: > Reading the release process docs it looks like there are some > repercussions for casting a -1 vote on a release, so I wanted to hold > off before voting. However it looks to me like there are enough major > issues that we should resolve these before making the 0.21 release? > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <[email protected]> wrote: >> Found a minor issue. When you create a project from the archetype, the JDBC >> setup is incorrect. It will build, but not run [1] >> >> Jasha >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-949 >> >> >> On 3 April 2013 20:27, Raminder Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.21 release candidate. >>> >>> For more information on the release process, checkout - >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >>> >>> Some of the things to check before voting are: >>> - can you run the demo binaries >>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag >>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE >>> files >>> - are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable >>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
