Yeah all good points Chris. We are on 1.0.x which is officially the last stable release, but maybe it makes sense to go to 1.1.6.
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013, Chris Geer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Erin Noe-Payne > <[email protected]<javascript:;> > >wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > > Based on our discussion surrounding RAVE 1048 [1], I was looking at > > how to improve our resource functionality to support PUT operations. I > > came across the Restangular library [2], which offers an alternative > > to ngResource. Restangular resources provide out of the box support > > for PUT and PATCH methods, and return promises rather than empty > > objects, which means they work better with the resolve arguments for > > routing and controllers. > > > > I'm going to try it out and submit a patch with the changes so anyone > > who is interested can compare - but weigh in now if you have any > > opinion. > > > > FYI - I asked my UI engineer about this seeing if he wanted to use it > internally and this was his response for what it's worth. > > One thing to note is that we are using angular 1.1.5 and the code has been > written in a way to easily move to angular 1.2 once it is finalized. In > angular 1.2 the $resource does return a promise making it a tough to beat. > Also the core angular team has focused a lot on the $http and $resource > during the 1.2 development resulting in several breaking changes. So I > would be concerned that this plugin may not be on the same course as the > angular team. > > > > > > Erin > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-1048 > > [2] https://github.com/mgonto/restangular > > >
