+1 for Chris & Erin's thoughts
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Erin Noe-Payne <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes chris, that's what I was thinking. Preferences being a nested > resource of the regionWidget instance. > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Chris Geer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Something like PUT .../<region-widget-id>/prefs?? > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Sean Cooper <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Long time since I saw the code... i thought saving the region is for > saving > >> location information and any preferences would be an entirely separate > >> process > >> > >> -Sean > >> On Sep 11, 2013 3:04 PM, "Erin Noe-Payne" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Probably separate imo > >> > > >> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Gornstein, Daniel S. > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > All, > >> > > > >> > > I had a quick question about how saving region widget preferences > will > >> > work: > >> > > > >> > > Should there be a separate rest endpoint to save region widget > prefs, > >> or > >> > will you save the region widget with the prefs attached, and that will > >> then > >> > save the preferences? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Dan Gornstein > >> > > >> >
