I echo Chris' sentiments. Bootstrap 3 has a completely different grid-layout system based on the mobile-first mentality so it would probably be best to hold off on integrating that for now.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Chris Geer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Dan Gornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey everyone, > > > > Rave is still using jQuery 1.7.2, and jquery plugins, such as jqueryUI, > > that work with the older version of jQuery. > > > > jQuery 1.9.x and 2.0.x are both released, however 2.0.x dropped support > for > > IE 6/7/8. > > > > I assume we still want to support IE 8 and maybe 7, so we will probably > > want to stay at 1.9.x. > > > > I was seeing what you guys think about upgrading jquery and its plugins? > Is > > there a need to do this, or should we wait? I don't mind working the > story > > if everyone is in agreement that we should upgrade. > > > > Also, I believe Twitter Bootstrap has also been upgraded, which has > > breaking changes in their syntax. I am pretty sure that if we upgrade > > jQuery we will have to upgrade Boostrap, as the older Bootstrap uses > > features which have been depreciated in the newest version of jQuery. > > > > Here are some helpful links in the upgrading of jQuery and Bootstrap: > > > > http://jquery.com/upgrade-guide/1.9/ > > > > > > > http://bassjobsen.weblogs.fm/migrate-your-templates-from-twitter-bootstrap-2-x-to-twitter-bootstrap-3/ > > > > Let me know what you guys think, and I can add some JIRA tickets if we > will > > do these upgrades. > > > > +1 - my preference would be to upgrade to the latest jQuery 1.9 release and > the latest Bootstrap 2.x release. > > Let's save jQuery 2.0 and Bootstrap 3.x for a later upgrade. > > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > >
