Ross Gardler, you can see a Vagrant configuration for the Angular branch over at:
https://github.com/jmeas/rave/tree/ng-vagrant The instructions for installation are in the README. Note that the installation may fail during the `cargo:run` stage due to a missing dependency. This is an active issue we're working to solve. There's a separate issue thread (the only other active one for the Rave project this week) regarding this. On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote: > I want to see a VagrantFile for Rave. I had intended to hold one, but it > has never made it to the top of my to-do list. > > Would love to see one (and help improve it I hope) > On 1 Jul 2014 21:04, "Jmeas Apache" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Apache Rave is a non-trivial application to get up and running on a new > > machine. Carl and I are thinking things could be greatly simplified with > > tools like Vagrant, Ansible and Grunt, so we'd like to hear the thoughts > of > > the Rave community on adding these tools. > > > > Our thoughts now are placing all of the Java & Java-related dependencies > to > > the Vagrant box. This will allow anyone to get the Java environment by > > simply running `vagrant up`, instead of figuring out all of the > > dependencies on their local machine. > > > > A PR that introduces Vagrant (with Ansible for provisioning) can be seen > > over here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/rave/pull/2 > > > > and on Jira at: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-1099 > > > > For development, we're thinking a typical Grunt workflow could be > > incorporated to make things really nice. The Tomcat server could be > booted > > up with a Grunt command, files could be linted and built, > > unit/integration/functional/whatever tests we want to add can be done > > automatically, and to top it off it can all be performed as you work with > > watch. > > > > We're working on an initial Grunt PR now, and should have it ready soon. > At > > first it will just do simple things, and can be iterated upon later. > > > > What do y'all think? > > >
