Hi Chimezie,

> I have been (in part) but I've been stumped by the fact that the
> current evaluation method ( sparql.queryObject ) is limited in the
> kinds of patterns it can handle - as pointed out earlier.  I've taken
> the time instead to try to familiarize myself with the recent paper on
> SPARQL semantics [1] in order to determine how to 'fully' implement
> the composition approach (as described there) to SPARQL evaluation.
>

Thanks for the reference, another interesting paper is [2], it
describes the JRDF implementation. Section 2.7 also discusses the
approach from Perez.

> All the pieces are there to support the full specification, the
> challenge is to rewrite or refactor the existing expantion tree
> mechanism to accomodate a moving target (the spec) without any formal
> understanding of the consequences.

Implementing the evaluation algorithm from [1] using the intermediary
format for graph pattern expressions produced by the bison SPARQL
parser would probably result in cleaner code since many lines in
SPARQLEvaluate.py are used to prepare the input to sparql.queryObject.
I did some simple attempts in that direction (not using the algorithm
in [1] though) a couple of months ago because I wanted to understand
the details of how SPARQL queries are evaluated. Rewriting has the
downside that a lot of the existing and tested code in rdflib.sparql
would go unused...

Since the spec. is changing I think it is more important that it is
known exactly what the rdflib parser and evaluator supports. If I as a
user want to use rdflib, what can I expect? Related to this are the
tests running against the RDF DAWG data set, is the list with
commented out tests in test/BisonSPARQLParser/test.py up-to-date?

I'm currently using rdflib within a project and would be interested
spending time on the SPARQL query evaluation implementation. Please,
let me know how I can contribute?

Cheers,
Mikael

[1] http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/~cgutierr/papers/sparql.pdf
[2] http://jrdf.sourceforge.net/RelationalBasedSPARQL.pdf
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@rdflib.net
http://rdflib.net/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to