On Nov 13, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Niklas Lindström wrote: > Hi, > > that sounds great! > > Do you plan to use the wiki for documentation and examples as well?
Yes. The integrated wiki code.google has is one of the motivating forces for the move. > And will this move also replace the current use of Launchpad? I think so. We have a small enough list of issues on Launchpad that we can move them over fairly easily. And blueprints didn't turn out to be what we were hoping for them to be. Think we can do what we were hoping to do with them with a combination of wiki pages and email/irc discussions. > I suppose this will require something to keep the contributor access. > Should be straightforward enough though. I can go through the people with svn commit access and add the ones for whom I know their google id. Else anyone feel free to join http:// code.google.com/p/rdflib/ -- I think people can join on their own? > Best regards, > Niklas > > (Btw, I've had too little time for participation for a while now, but > I plan to change that. I want to look more at the planned package > split and try out Chimezies (excellent) SPARQL-work, for instance..) I think a lot of us have been in that mode. Hopefully the addition of better project infrastructure will lower the bar for how much time we all need to effectively participate with the little time we have. > > On 11/13/07, Daniel Krech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to cut over to using code.google for the rdflib project >> infrastructure. We've talked about this off and on for a while now >> on irc >> and people seems to be for it. While there have been some >> advantages of >> putting together our own project infrastructure I think we've been >> paying >> the price by not having it up to par (others have brought this up >> in the >> past too). And that we'd be better off focusing our bandwidth into >> the >> project proper instead of into custom infrastructure for the >> project. We can >> still do some additional bits on rdflib.net, but for the basic >> project >> infrastructure bits let's leverage code.google. >> >> So, I'd like to start by checking to see if anyone has strong >> objects or >> reasons why they think this might not be a step forward. And would >> like to >> do the svnsync tomorrow if people are not in the middle of any >> changes? I'll >> also plan on updating rdflib.net to point to all the relevant bits >> on http://code.google.com/p/rdflib/ for svn, issues, etc. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel Krech, http://eikeon.com/ >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> Dev@rdflib.net >> http://rdflib.net/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@rdflib.net http://rdflib.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
