+1 (non-binding)

 - The README.md documentation is proper and verbose for each release
candidate.

Best,
Harish Krishnakumar

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 8:17 PM Mohammad Sadoghi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> -Download links looks fine
> -Checksums and PGP signatures looks fine
> -LICENSE and NOTICE files are added
> -files have license headers
> -No unlicensed compiled archives
>
> ---
> Best Regards,
> Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> Associate Professor
> Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> Department of Computer Science
> University of California, Davis
>
> ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> Apache ResilientDB (Incubating): https://resilientdb.com/
> Phone: 914-319-7937
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 9:42 AM Apratim Shukla
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Apratim Shukla
> > [email protected]
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025, 12:36 AM Junchao Chen <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mohammad,
> > >
> > > Thanks for letting me know.
> > > The KEY file is there now.
> > >
> > >
> > > Junchao,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 4:06 AM Mohammad Sadoghi <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Junchao
> > > >
> > > > There seems to be typo in the second link that you provided.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > > > Associate Professor
> > > > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > > > Department of Computer Science
> > > > University of California, Davis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 03:01 Junchao Chen
> <[email protected]
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a call for vote to release Apache ResilientDB(Incubating)
> > > version
> > > > > 1.11.0-rc0.
> > > > >
> > > > > The release candidates:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/1.11.0-rc0/
> > > > >
> > > > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev//incubator/resilientdb/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > > number
> > > > > of votes are reached.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > > Checklist for reference:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > > > > [ ] Source code distributions have correct names matching the
> current
> > > > > release.
> > > > > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each repo.
> > > > > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> > > > > [ ] No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Junchao
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to