Yea axe that stuff

Why can't this be added as a devDependency to package.json ?

On 4/11/13 4:00 PM, "Gord Tanner" <[email protected]> wrote:

>+1
>
>submodules have always annoyed me. Cleaning up our installation / dev env
>setup would be nice and tie in good with attempting to get `npm install`
>support working
>
>
>On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Dan Silivestru
><[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I think we've talked about doing this for a little while.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Brent Lintner <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > I want to remove our Jasmine dependency from .gitmodules because it is
>> the
>> > only thing used as a .git module, and because git submodules have (in
>>my
>> > experience) been more annoying to have than the benefit they provide.
>> > Instead, it will be added directly to the project source tree (like
>> > everything else that is not in the NPM registry).
>> >
>> > This will also remove all use of .gitmodules, and will also remove a
>> single
>> > step in 'configure', leaving only npm calls, which will make
>>installation
>> > more simple and straightforward.
>> >
>> > I will also be removing and re-adding the latest version of Jasmine.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Brent
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dan Silivestru
>> +1 (519) 589-3624
>>

Reply via email to